That Bonds Conversation Got heated

According to the Forum posters, they say he wasnt convicted.. But still either way I dont think that N.O would allow someone who had been Accused and Arrested behind something like that Come back to work around Kids..

Here are some of the Posts.

Smalls 24 said...
coming from a legal background, u can not NOT hire sumone for an ALLIGATION!!! there was not sound evidence that he did this to the young man/woman. all they have it his word vs her/his word.... i am sure he will get the job back here... if he does not, then thats gonna be another law suit he has much like the one against the Delaware State Police..

Here was a Replay direcly after ..
(referring to the guy replying to me)

cwebb, said...
It is obvious you do not have a legal background not only by the words you can't spell but by your logic. You CAN not hire someone from an allegation. An employer has the discretion to hire or not hire whomever they want. Ask other sex offenders and pedophiles how many employers turned them down. Another thing, I wouldn't be on here defending someone if you have not talked to the young man that was involved in the case.

After That Someone else Replyed

Idiots! Bonds did nothing!!!! lets start there, if u read the report that was done in Delaware, u will see all the words, what happened? Nothing? How can your prove n e thang happened? U Cant. The difference betweem bonds and the other people who r sex offenders and other people of sex crimes, is they were charged with something of that nature, which means they have to register and keep it up to date. Bonds, was not charged with anything, becasue there was no evidence to charge him with. the students word against bonds word. If he does not get the job at reed or n e where else in the city of new orleans, watch bonds get his lawyer, ( who is a genius) to state to the judge, the only reason his client did not get the job is because of what they read in the paper... the judge will ask for proof, and there u have it. no charges against bonds were filed, so now he has another law suit with the NOPS or RSD....

i am an admin assistant at a court house.... dats where the law background cums from.... cwebb

... There was MORE .. But the Reply that I Mainly Agreed with was

A Replay To This Reply

which is here by sinister1

a conviction isn't necessary. A criminal record is not necessary. The issue is the civil liability of the school district. The problem is his history. People are very apprehensive about putting an instructor around kids when they have a history of sexual misconduct, verified or not. Bonds may be one of the great NO band directors but chances are the NO school board will not want to open the door for a potential lawsuit.

The Full Thing is at Nola's forum yall..

Its wild

HERE is a direct like to the post started by me, All reply's are below